Home
mooreroom [userpic]

Teddy Bear Insults Islam...What?

November 28th, 2007 (08:16 am)

A 54-year-old British school teacher could receive 40 lashes and 6 months in jail for allowing her Sudanese pupils to name a class Teddy bear "Mohammed," reports CNN. Perhaps not as egregious as the punishment sentenced to a Saudi gang rape victim for "embarrassing" the Saudi judges who had let her rapists off the hook, it is still a ridiculously disproportionate punishment to the crime, if there really is one at all. To me it is one more instance of religious stupidity compounded by warped concepts of "honor."

The irony is that Sudanese officials have charged the school teacher with "insulting" Islam, even though the Koran does not prohibit engraved images, people name their children after the prophet all the time, and, um, hello - it's a teddy bear! The name was chosen by school children, many of whom are probably named after the prophet, too, and have several family members who share the name. It wasn't meant as an insult, it was supposed to be an honor.

I acknowledge that there is a lot about the role of "honor" in other cultures that I do not understand. It could be my own limitations as a Westerner, as a neurotic self-denigrating humorist, as a post-modern ironist, or as a simple crank. Yet I find it horrific and sick that the concept of "honor" is used to justify a lot of brutality and killing, often in so-called "honor killings" against women who have somehow transgressed social expectations regarding their "proper place" as wives and daughters or have caused men to feel insulted. While much of the reporting on this phenomenon is concentrated on the Middle East and Central Asia, it would be unfair to disregard similar instances in Western culture - notably, "gay panic" or the more murderous instances of transphobia.

I don't get it, and honestly, I don't want to "get" it, because it seems more a disease than a point of cultural competency, a plague of the male psyche borne on carriers of religion, myth, historic oppression and warped definitions of sexual and gender identity.

Comments

Posted by: Dylan Meconis ([info]quirkybird)
Posted at: November 28th, 2007 05:51 pm (UTC)

I have no problem with the concept of "honor" being used as a voluntary reason to hold BACK from inflicting one's self on others. Not as an excuse to pound somebody else for violating rules they didn't necessarily sign up for in the first place.

But again, that's a very individualistic, Western concept of honor.

Posted by: Aaron, Lawyer Pepper ([info]varro)
Posted at: November 28th, 2007 05:54 pm (UTC)

A big problem on the Left is cultural relativism - excusing abhorrent behavior of other cultures.

The behavior of the Saudi courts is flat out wrong, and Sharia is an apartheid court system. The Sudanese reaction to the teddy bear is not only wrong, but worse than that, it's stupid.

There have to be some fixed standards for justice systems worldwide. They include: equal treatment on the basis of race, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, religion, and other suspect classifications; no death penalty except for egregious murders; no corporal punishment, torture, or amputation; strict protection of rights of the accused; and a near-absolute guarantee of freedom of speech, press, and religion.

Call me Eurocentric, but these are fixed standards, and I certainly hold the United States to them (cough, Guantanamo).

2 Read Comments