Home
mooreroom [userpic]

An Evening of Magical (Over)Thinking

October 19th, 2007 (09:51 pm)



It's been 25 years since I last saw "E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial" or thought about it. Or cared about it. So now my daughter is watching it, completely riveted, while I sit there completely confused. I remember following along with the movie's emotional logic when I saw it as a 12-year-old, but that was before I had a grasp of character, plot, story structure, internal consistency and, well, reality.

I can recall movie reviews comparing "E.T." to "Bambi" and thus Spielberg to Disney. But "Bambi" actually made sense. It more or less followed the cycles of life and the seasons, presenting animal life within a natural world full of elegant pleasures (ice skating on a pond, birth, mating) and real terrors (hunters, forest fires, rivals interfering with the mating.) "E.T." has, let's see, vaguely scary government agents, scientists paving the road to hell with good intentions, and renegade kids on bicycles who defy authority with pluck and determination. Fair enough. We can work with that.

But where does E.T. get his magical alien powers from? Why are they so arbitrary (heal a wound, make bikes fly)? And how does his magic square with his technological skills as demonstrated through his rigging a Speak-N-Spell with the telephone to contact a ship light years out into space? When he drinks, why does Eliot get drunk? Why do they take him trick-or-treating? What evolutionary processes formed E.T.'s bizarre physiogonomy? What were the aliens doing in our neck of the universe anyway?

There is suspension of disbelief and then there is completely shutting down all brain functions. Yet I say all this as an adult. The movie made complete sense to Katie. "I wish it could happen in real life," she said. "Except for the end when he leaves. That's sad."

Comments

Posted by: Dirty Librarian ([info]dirtylibrarian)
Posted at: October 20th, 2007 05:39 am (UTC)
make-believe

I think the movie works because ET is so incomprehensible. If aliens did show up on our planet, capable of traveling across galaxies and such, it seems to me that much about them would be beyond our comprehension. I think in some ways Spielberg is celebrating the innocence and wonder of childhood because it is what allows the children (and yours) to connect with this species on a deeper emotional level, without the developed sense of logic getting in the way. The idea that we could possibly connect on the heart-light level takes away the scariness of the unknown out there, and showcases some of the best of what humanity has to offer: hope.

Can you tell I just got home from bookgroup?

Posted by: ldragoon ([info]ldragoon)
Posted at: October 20th, 2007 08:34 am (UTC)

If you want a harrowing read, read the book Bambi. OMG. It's a freakin' bloodbath.

Posted by: I Love You But I've Chosen Dorkness ([info]mister_punchy)
Posted at: October 20th, 2007 08:06 pm (UTC)
jack

You're probably right. But part of me is happy to know it's still mesmerizing to kids this much later.

I have The Muppet Movie on in the next room. Give her that one next. It's still awesome.

Posted by: ((Anonymous))
Posted at: October 22nd, 2007 09:49 pm (UTC)
advertising FYI

hi

this film is considered the first to use product placement... Mars company turned down putting M&Ms in the film ...so they went to the Reece's Pieces company and they agreed to pay to put the RP's into ET... the product exploded with a 60% increase in sales immediately after ET came out...

little kids being advertised to via a movie...

now product placement is part of the advertising plan..

love, mom

Posted by: ((Anonymous))
Posted at: October 23rd, 2007 02:45 am (UTC)
spielberg said it was modeled on christ's story

i remember reading that way back when there, but i haven't looked it up to confirm lately. it does explain the "not making any sense and yet you're supposed to like it and pay for it, damnit" part.
dino

5 Read Comments