January 10th, 2008 (10:08 am)
Too Sense Blog joins a rising chorus of responses to Steinem's racism-vs.-sexism argument:
.... women don't stop being white because they're women. And Hillary Clinton has not lost her access to white privilege because she is a woman. The current media narrative, even as Obama takes the lead in the polls, is so utterly familiar: White is substance, black is style. She's the real deal, he's the flash in the pan. She's "competent" while Obama is merely inspiring. He is a good show, but not "presidential" as old fat white dude Andy Rooney would say.
Steinem embraces this narrative, because adressing white privilige would complicate the mantle of victimhood she is attempting to drape herself with. Yes, it is very true that the media has been unfair to Hillary Clinton...but she has yet to be accused of being a Muslim radical in disguise. That accusation would hold as much truth leveled at Hillary as it does directed at Obama, but he's black, so the "Madrassa" story sticks.
The whole post is worth reading, btw.
UPDATE: Fulfilling her role as Gloria Steinem's bizarro world counterpart,
Camille Paglia offers her sexist analysis of Hillary Clinton's "sadomasochistic" psyche as part of her justification for voting for Barak Obama.
UPDATE UPDATE: I'm just posting this stuff as I come across it. But
Frances Kissling's "Why I'm Still Not for Hillary Clinton" is truly worth reading.